Recently, the author discovered a strange phenomenon in some chemical companies: The products of these companies have two inspection reports. One is issued by an authoritative testing agency of the country where the company is located, and the other is issued by the local technical supervision bureau. After careful inquiry, it is known that this is a helpless move of the company. The users of the enterprise only recognize the inspection report of the authoritative organization in the industry, and the local technical supervision department has to test it again every year regardless of whether the product has passed the test. Therefore, two inspection reports have appeared, one for the user to see. One is to deal with the technical supervision department.
Since the company's products have already been recognized by the national authorities, why does the local technical supervision bureau have to test it again? According to insiders, the local technical supervision department has done so, it has to pull the local quality inspection department. It turns out that local quality inspection institutes have annual revenue-generating targets, but the quality inspection institute does not have enforcement power, and the source of income can only be inspection fees. However, many companies do not buy the accounts of quality inspection agencies. Directly going to companies for random inspections and charges is often rejected. The local technical supervision department has just the right to enforce the law and can force the company to take random inspections. So the two companies worked together: the technical supervision department went to the company for sampling fees, the samples were sent to the quality inspection department for inspection, and the quality inspection institute issued a report for a further fee, and the two companies were well-qualified.
Undoubtedly, such tests are detrimental. Not only does it increase the burden on companies, but it also seriously affects the credibility and image of law enforcement agencies. At the same time, this kind of behavior is easily used by unscrupulous companies, leading to confusion in the market order. Because the purpose of the test is to generate revenue, the degree of concern about the quality of the product will naturally be reduced. As long as the company pays enough money, even if the product quality is unqualified, it can get a report of qualified testing. Unqualified products rely on money to clear the way, to successfully enter the market, the market can not mess it?
Market economy is essentially a legal economy, order economy, and regulatory economy. The first thing that should be regulated is the management of various levels of government. It is the key to the normal operation of the entire market economy because these departments can do their jobs according to the law rather than rely on personal interests. When these departments come to chaos, they are all chaos.
I hope that the strange phenomenon of two test reports for a product can disappear as quickly as possible. However, management departments that wish to enforce their own interests will no longer behave like this. I hope all companies can survive and develop in a strong regulatory environment.
Since the company's products have already been recognized by the national authorities, why does the local technical supervision bureau have to test it again? According to insiders, the local technical supervision department has done so, it has to pull the local quality inspection department. It turns out that local quality inspection institutes have annual revenue-generating targets, but the quality inspection institute does not have enforcement power, and the source of income can only be inspection fees. However, many companies do not buy the accounts of quality inspection agencies. Directly going to companies for random inspections and charges is often rejected. The local technical supervision department has just the right to enforce the law and can force the company to take random inspections. So the two companies worked together: the technical supervision department went to the company for sampling fees, the samples were sent to the quality inspection department for inspection, and the quality inspection institute issued a report for a further fee, and the two companies were well-qualified.
Undoubtedly, such tests are detrimental. Not only does it increase the burden on companies, but it also seriously affects the credibility and image of law enforcement agencies. At the same time, this kind of behavior is easily used by unscrupulous companies, leading to confusion in the market order. Because the purpose of the test is to generate revenue, the degree of concern about the quality of the product will naturally be reduced. As long as the company pays enough money, even if the product quality is unqualified, it can get a report of qualified testing. Unqualified products rely on money to clear the way, to successfully enter the market, the market can not mess it?
Market economy is essentially a legal economy, order economy, and regulatory economy. The first thing that should be regulated is the management of various levels of government. It is the key to the normal operation of the entire market economy because these departments can do their jobs according to the law rather than rely on personal interests. When these departments come to chaos, they are all chaos.
I hope that the strange phenomenon of two test reports for a product can disappear as quickly as possible. However, management departments that wish to enforce their own interests will no longer behave like this. I hope all companies can survive and develop in a strong regulatory environment.
Schmidt Bretten Heat Exchanger,Eplacement Schmidt Gaskets,Schmidt Bretten Phe Gasket,Phe Gasket For Schmidt
Dongguan Runfengda F&M Co., Ltd , https://www.dgrunfengda.com