During the "two sessions" last year, the "difficulty of sharing large scientific research equipment" became a hot topic for the deputies. This year's follow-up interview by reporters found that another issue related to this is equally thought-provoking: China's annual research and development of fixed assets worth trillions of yuan. Of the investments, 60% are used for equipment imports; some high-end equipment is 100% dependent on imports. CPPCC members worry that excessive reliance on imports of scientific research equipment has dragged down innovation.
"Our TD-SCDMA technology is developing well, but there are many technical constraints. One of the important aspects is the test instrumentation. Without advanced test equipment, the technology and quality are difficult to guarantee." In today's CPPCC scientific and technological community At the joint meeting, Deputy Minister of Industry and Information Technology, Min Qinjian, who attended the meeting, used this example to echo Zhu Xing's speech on strengthening research and development of domestic scientific instruments.
Professor Zhu Xing’s speech from Peking University’s School of Physics originated from a survey on the status quo of domestic scientific instruments. This survey shows that 60% of China’s annual research and development investment in fixed assets is used for imported equipment. High-end equipment in some areas is 100% reliant on imports. The total number of imported instruments is several billion U.S. dollars each year, and annual 30% increase in speed.
“Over the past 20 years, China has gradually lost its international competitiveness in terms of innovation in key advanced instruments, and is at a disadvantage in the competition in most major advanced equipment fields. Critical scientific equipment and equipment rely heavily on foreign technology.†Zhu Xing is rather worried, “China The gap between the research and manufacturing of scientific instruments and the developed countries is not narrowing but gradually widening, and the dependence on foreign instruments is increasing year by year."
Liu Yanhua, the former deputy minister of the Ministry of Science and Technology, once pointed out that the Chinese people’s enthusiasm for purchasing scientific equipment does not know how many foreign companies have been saved. Due to the high degree of dependence on scientific research instruments, China’s scientific research has a serious “emptiness†phenomenon.
“That's because most of the research we do is to follow and imitate others. The instruments used in these studies can be purchased from abroad. We don't use sophisticated and customized instruments at all, so no one will do it.†This issue is considered by the CPPCC members.
In Zhu Xing’s view, “The reason why this phenomenon occurs is that the current technology evaluation system focuses on the fast-tracking of the international development frontier and concentrates on the contributions of system instrument researchers who have not been fully documented in scientific papers, citation rates, and awards. Recognition." Zhu Xing said that because of the academic environment with quick success and instant benefits, very few people are willing to sit on cold benches to perform low-level work. As a result, the existing instrument research and development personnel and supporting staff of many units no longer exist.
In addition, the rapid increase in research funding in recent years has allowed researchers to spend more on expensive research instruments that were previously unimaginable, which objectively affected the enthusiasm of researchers in instrument development.
For Chinese scholars to participate in international large-scale research device cooperation projects, Zhu Xing believes that it is also a double-edged sword. Although it has trained domestic instrument R&D teams, it also leads to dependence on international large-scale device projects and is not conducive to the development of independent knowledge. Property instrument.
“We must realize that major breakthroughs in modern science and technology rely more and more on advanced scientific instruments. Whoever has mastered the most advanced scientific instrument research and development technology will have the initiative in the development of science and technology,†said Zhu Xing.
"I work closely with the nano-optics research work and the invention of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM)." He took the development of STM and opened up new fields for nanotechnology research. For example, the 1986 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to Scientists working at IBM Labs in Switzerland, this award was awarded to shake the scientific community: Why is this experimental observation technique based only on the most basic principles of quantum mechanics able to obtain the crown of science only five years after its debut?
“Because the invention of the key instrument STM, which is the core part of this achievement, enabled scientists to “look†at a single atom when scanning with a nanometer-sized probe on the surface of an object, allowing people to expand their vision to a single atom and a single molecule. In the past 20 years, STM, an innovative instrument, has opened a new field of nanotechnology research and become the most critical characterization instrument for nanomicroscopes.†Zhu Xing said, “Actually, the Nobel Prize has awarded dozens of new technologies, Scientists with new methods and new instrument development."
"Therefore, strengthening independent research and development and industrialization capabilities of scientific instruments is an inevitable choice to improve China's ability to independently innovate and build an innovative country, especially this year's government work report is a frontier for key research and cutting-edge technology research on nanotechnology. Deployment, and to achieve breakthroughs in these areas, we must develop advanced scientific instruments to support.†Zhu Xing said.
He believes that in order to improve China's science and technology funded research and development capabilities, special fund for research and development of innovative instruments should be established from different departments and at different levels; and the direction of key funding should be clearly defined. From key components to key technologies in a given period of time, key funding areas should be addressed. Turn to the development of the entire machine until the integration of innovation, the formation of a unique and competitive scientific instrument industry. “I hope relevant policies can be implemented in the 12th Five-Year Plan.â€
In addition, he also stated that it is necessary to improve the science and technology evaluation system, establish a good atmosphere for the research and development of advanced scientific instruments, support and encourage researchers to engage in innovative scientific instrument devices with long-term influence, and establish a research and development team that can endure loneliness to ensure China's innovative position in instrument development in certain key areas.
"Our TD-SCDMA technology is developing well, but there are many technical constraints. One of the important aspects is the test instrumentation. Without advanced test equipment, the technology and quality are difficult to guarantee." In today's CPPCC scientific and technological community At the joint meeting, Deputy Minister of Industry and Information Technology, Min Qinjian, who attended the meeting, used this example to echo Zhu Xing's speech on strengthening research and development of domestic scientific instruments.
Professor Zhu Xing’s speech from Peking University’s School of Physics originated from a survey on the status quo of domestic scientific instruments. This survey shows that 60% of China’s annual research and development investment in fixed assets is used for imported equipment. High-end equipment in some areas is 100% reliant on imports. The total number of imported instruments is several billion U.S. dollars each year, and annual 30% increase in speed.
“Over the past 20 years, China has gradually lost its international competitiveness in terms of innovation in key advanced instruments, and is at a disadvantage in the competition in most major advanced equipment fields. Critical scientific equipment and equipment rely heavily on foreign technology.†Zhu Xing is rather worried, “China The gap between the research and manufacturing of scientific instruments and the developed countries is not narrowing but gradually widening, and the dependence on foreign instruments is increasing year by year."
Liu Yanhua, the former deputy minister of the Ministry of Science and Technology, once pointed out that the Chinese people’s enthusiasm for purchasing scientific equipment does not know how many foreign companies have been saved. Due to the high degree of dependence on scientific research instruments, China’s scientific research has a serious “emptiness†phenomenon.
“That's because most of the research we do is to follow and imitate others. The instruments used in these studies can be purchased from abroad. We don't use sophisticated and customized instruments at all, so no one will do it.†This issue is considered by the CPPCC members.
In Zhu Xing’s view, “The reason why this phenomenon occurs is that the current technology evaluation system focuses on the fast-tracking of the international development frontier and concentrates on the contributions of system instrument researchers who have not been fully documented in scientific papers, citation rates, and awards. Recognition." Zhu Xing said that because of the academic environment with quick success and instant benefits, very few people are willing to sit on cold benches to perform low-level work. As a result, the existing instrument research and development personnel and supporting staff of many units no longer exist.
In addition, the rapid increase in research funding in recent years has allowed researchers to spend more on expensive research instruments that were previously unimaginable, which objectively affected the enthusiasm of researchers in instrument development.
For Chinese scholars to participate in international large-scale research device cooperation projects, Zhu Xing believes that it is also a double-edged sword. Although it has trained domestic instrument R&D teams, it also leads to dependence on international large-scale device projects and is not conducive to the development of independent knowledge. Property instrument.
“We must realize that major breakthroughs in modern science and technology rely more and more on advanced scientific instruments. Whoever has mastered the most advanced scientific instrument research and development technology will have the initiative in the development of science and technology,†said Zhu Xing.
"I work closely with the nano-optics research work and the invention of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM)." He took the development of STM and opened up new fields for nanotechnology research. For example, the 1986 Nobel Prize in physics was awarded to Scientists working at IBM Labs in Switzerland, this award was awarded to shake the scientific community: Why is this experimental observation technique based only on the most basic principles of quantum mechanics able to obtain the crown of science only five years after its debut?
“Because the invention of the key instrument STM, which is the core part of this achievement, enabled scientists to “look†at a single atom when scanning with a nanometer-sized probe on the surface of an object, allowing people to expand their vision to a single atom and a single molecule. In the past 20 years, STM, an innovative instrument, has opened a new field of nanotechnology research and become the most critical characterization instrument for nanomicroscopes.†Zhu Xing said, “Actually, the Nobel Prize has awarded dozens of new technologies, Scientists with new methods and new instrument development."
"Therefore, strengthening independent research and development and industrialization capabilities of scientific instruments is an inevitable choice to improve China's ability to independently innovate and build an innovative country, especially this year's government work report is a frontier for key research and cutting-edge technology research on nanotechnology. Deployment, and to achieve breakthroughs in these areas, we must develop advanced scientific instruments to support.†Zhu Xing said.
He believes that in order to improve China's science and technology funded research and development capabilities, special fund for research and development of innovative instruments should be established from different departments and at different levels; and the direction of key funding should be clearly defined. From key components to key technologies in a given period of time, key funding areas should be addressed. Turn to the development of the entire machine until the integration of innovation, the formation of a unique and competitive scientific instrument industry. “I hope relevant policies can be implemented in the 12th Five-Year Plan.â€
In addition, he also stated that it is necessary to improve the science and technology evaluation system, establish a good atmosphere for the research and development of advanced scientific instruments, support and encourage researchers to engage in innovative scientific instrument devices with long-term influence, and establish a research and development team that can endure loneliness to ensure China's innovative position in instrument development in certain key areas.
Six Axis Locking Machine,Screw Locking Machine With 6 Axis,,Six-Axis Automatic Screw Lock Machine,Screw Locking Machine For Six-Axis
Suzhou Huaweile Automation Technology Co., Ltd , https://www.hwlelocking.com